Those who do generally just click on the "next" button, and never have to pay for it (but they do have to click through the "please pay" menu). Once you've done all of the install, most people don't even bring up the winrar program.
#7zip or winrar trial#
I keep the latest 30 day trial around for installs. No problems means no reason to switch programs.Īs far as paying, I have a paid version on my media server and gaming rig. I've since upgraded to 圆4 winrar, and haven't seen any problems. The caveat is the testing was done about 3 years ago, using x86 versions of each program.
#7zip or winrar archive#
My experience with 7-zip is that any highly compressed archive makes previewing the files impossible, and the decompression itself generally takes longer (I've run Winrar and 7-zip in parallel and 7-zip took 10-30% longer). Winrar deals with them without an issue, and even lets me preview them without a problem.
7-Zip fast takes about same time as WinRar fast but compress slightly more than any WinRar setting. Most of the files I deal with are a few hundred MB to a couple of GB. 7-Zip fastest is faster than WinRar fastest but has lower compression. It is a bit quirky sometimes since it's a front end for various archivers. It has a nice interface, supports tons of archives and it's also free.
#7zip or winrar zip#
Just ramp up the word size parameter and you'll gain quite some better compression rate while keeping the ZIP compatibility. Oh and 7-zip allows you to create higher compression rate standard ZIP archives. LZMA2 is fast and has great results.Īlso, as a side note, RAR5 format is now also using a derivate of LZ77 compression (basically LZMA), meaning it'll have roughly the same compression, usually a bit worse than LZMA2 in 7-zip. Just not worth the crazy waiting time for such tiny benefits. Most other archivers take 50x longer (at rates like few hundred KB/s) and only gain 1-2MB better compression with several gigabytes of data. In my case even beyond 20MB/s which is lightning fast. It can use as many CPU cores as you can offer to the program, meaning it'll provide amazing output rate. It has been a while since i saw any of those.It's free, simple, no bloat or nags and has superb compression.
#7zip or winrar rar#
But when it comes to working with zip, rar and even 7z archives, i stick with WinRAR.īTW, the "terrible nag screens" go away from WinRAR once you buy it. The main reason i have it installed is because it can open more formats than WinRAR, especially useful when dealing with disk images from VirtualBox since i can simply open it with 7zip and extract files from there directly without booting the VM. There are other issues with 7zip as well as a lack of features (practically zero features in the self-extracting archive generator, as an example). This is very useful when i want to run some game from a gamejam, run an installer which for whatever reason isn't part of an executable, test an archived build of a project that is made up of exe+data, check an archived webpage that is made up of several html and image files, etc.Īs a sidenote (and another source of frustration), 7zip also has the annoying behavior of deleting that temp file almost right after it extracts it (i'm not sure exactly how it decides that) which means that unless the associated program is fast enough to open it, it'll get deleted under its feet, creating a race condition between the associated program and 7zip. With WinRAR i just double click the executable and WinRAR does the rest. This means that with 7zip i have to manually unzip the archive somewhere first, usually drag and dropping the top folder in the archive (assuming it has one, many donts) in the desktop or a temp folder, then open that temp folder, run it and then delete the folder.
Obviously this is the reason why 7zip package is about 1 MB (less than WinRar) and PeaZip is about 6 MB (still just the half of WinZip. html file or anything in an archive that relies on other files in the archive (dlls, images, data files, whatever): 7zip extracts only the file i double clicked on, ignoring everything else whereas WinRAR extracts all files since chances are if an executable is part of an archive, it'll need the other files in the archive to work too. PeaZip also adds various heterogeneous features often asked on 7zip forums, ranging from support for more formats, secure deletion, file hashing, nicer icons, better looking file manager with themes and so on. One example, which for me is one of the most annoying aspects of using 7zip, is double clicking on an.
"mediocre" or "good enough" or other things) but WinRAR's UX is simply better. There is nothing wrong with 7zip's UI (and a program cannot be only "perfect" or "garbage", there are in-between, e.g.
0 kommentar(er)
